Data Analysis
Our analysis of all available data, including recent performances and player stats up until an hour before kickoff, suggested the most likely outcome of this match was a Wolverhampton Wanderers win with a probability of 38.46%. A win for Nottingham Forest had a probability of 35.29% and a draw had a probability of 26.2%.
The most likely scoreline for a Wolverhampton Wanderers win was 0-1 with a probability of 9.78%. The next most likely scorelines for that outcome were 1-2 (8.39%) and 0-2 (6.57%). The likeliest Nottingham Forest win was 1-0 (9.28%), while for a drawn scoreline it was 1-1 (12.48%). The actual scoreline of 0-4 was predicted with a 1% likelihood. Our data analysis correctly predicted that Wolverhampton Wanderers would win this match.
Result | ||
Nottingham Forest | Draw | Wolverhampton Wanderers |
35.29% | 26.25% | 38.46% |
Both teams to score 53.31% |
Goals |
Over 2.5 | Under 2.5 |
48.69% | 51.31% |
Over 3.5 | Under 3.5 |
26.87% | 73.13% |
Nottingham Forest Goals |
Over 0.5 | Under 0.5 |
72.1% | 27.9% |
Over 1.5 | Under 1.5 |
36.49% | 63.51% |
Wolverhampton Wanderers Goals |
Over 0.5 | Under 0.5 |
73.94% | 26.06% |
Over 1.5 | Under 1.5 |
38.89% | 61.11% |
Score Analysis |
Nottingham Forest | Draw | Wolverhampton Wanderers |
1-0 @ 9.28% 2-1 @ 7.97% 2-0 @ 5.93% 3-1 @ 3.39% 3-0 @ 2.52% 3-2 @ 2.28% 4-1 @ 1.08% Other @ 2.84% Total : 35.29% | 1-1 @ 12.48% 0-0 @ 7.27% 2-2 @ 5.36% 3-3 @ 1.02% Other @ 0.12% Total : 26.25% | 0-1 @ 9.78% 1-2 @ 8.39% 0-2 @ 6.57% 1-3 @ 3.76% 0-3 @ 2.95% 2-3 @ 2.4% 1-4 @ 1.27% 0-4 @ 0.99% Other @ 2.36% Total : 38.46% |
How you voted: Nott'm Forest vs Wolves
Sinner
64 6 6
Team | P | W | D | L | F | A | GD | PTS | |
1 | Arsenal | 29 | 23 | 3 | 3 | 70 | 27 | 43 | 72 |
2 | Manchester CityMan City | 28 | 20 | 4 | 4 | 71 | 26 | 45 | 64 |
3 | Manchester UnitedMan Utd | 26 | 15 | 5 | 6 | 41 | 35 | 6 | 50 |
4 | Tottenham HotspurSpurs | 28 | 15 | 4 | 9 | 52 | 40 | 12 | 49 |
5 | Newcastle UnitedNewcastle | 26 | 12 | 11 | 3 | 39 | 19 | 20 | 47 |
6 | Brighton & Hove AlbionBrighton | 26 | 12 | 7 | 7 | 49 | 34 | 15 | 43 |
7 | Brentford | 28 | 10 | 13 | 5 | 46 | 37 | 9 | 43 |
8 | Liverpool | 27 | 12 | 6 | 9 | 48 | 33 | 15 | 42 |
9 | Aston Villa | 28 | 12 | 5 | 11 | 37 | 39 | -2 | 41 |
10 | Fulham | 28 | 11 | 6 | 11 | 39 | 39 | 0 | 39 |
11 | Chelsea | 28 | 10 | 8 | 10 | 29 | 30 | -1 | 38 |
12 | Crystal Palace | 29 | 7 | 9 | 13 | 24 | 39 | -15 | 30 |
13 | Wolverhampton WanderersWolves | 29 | 7 | 7 | 15 | 23 | 42 | -19 | 28 |
14 | Nottingham ForestNott'm Forest | 28 | 6 | 9 | 13 | 23 | 50 | -27 | 27 |
15 | Bournemouth | 28 | 7 | 6 | 15 | 27 | 55 | -28 | 27 |
16 | Leeds UnitedLeeds | 28 | 6 | 8 | 14 | 36 | 48 | -12 | 26 |
17 | Everton | 28 | 6 | 8 | 14 | 22 | 40 | -18 | 26 |
18 | Leicester CityLeicester | 28 | 7 | 4 | 17 | 39 | 49 | -10 | 25 |
19 | West Ham UnitedWest Ham | 26 | 6 | 6 | 14 | 24 | 34 | -10 | 24 |
20 | Southampton | 28 | 6 | 5 | 17 | 23 | 46 | -23 | 23 |
> Full Version |










